Kimi K3.1 Pro API Pricing
Kimi K3.1 Pro is Moonshot's flagship from October 24, 2026: a post-trained Kimi K3 with a 1M-token context, priced at $2.00/M input, $0.20/M cache-hit input and $10.00/M output. That is a third below K3 on every rate, and K3 stays on the price list as the previous generation. Thinking is always on, so output includes reasoning. Moonshot says the full weights will be released by November 4, 2026.
Kimi K3.1 Pro API cost calculator.
Live calculator pre-loaded with Kimi K3.1 Pro rates. Reasoning effort runs low, high or max (the default), and reasoning tokens bill as output, so put them in the reasoning field.
Kimi K3.1 Pro cost on real workloads.
Codebase-scale migration
Reading 100-page contracts
Ticket triage
Research planning turn
This is a chars-per-token approximation, not a real tokenizer. Actual tokens vary by language, code density, and tool-call overhead — counts are typically ±10–20% off for English prose, more for code or non-Latin scripts. For exact billing, use the vendor's official tokenizer.
| Model | Input /M | Output /M | Effective blended | Context | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3.1 Pro Current | $2.00 cache $0.20 | $10.00 | $1.28 agentic 92/8 | 1M | Frontier Kimi agents - 1M context |
| Kimi K3 | $3.00 cache $0.30 | $15.00 | $1.92 +50% | 1M | The previous Kimi flagship |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | $2.00 cache $0.10 | $10.00 | $1.29 same | 1.05M | OpenAI's model at the same list price |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | $4.00 cache $0.20 | $20.00 | $2.58 +2.0× | 1M | Frontier coding agents |
| GLM-5.3 | $1.40 cache $0.26 | $4.40 | $0.78 −39% | 1M | Cheaper Chinese frontier, 1M context |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | $1.32 cache $0.044 | $3.96 | $0.569 −2.3× | 1M | Budget Chinese frontier |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $0.75 cache $0.075 | $3.75 | $0.481 −2.7× · promo | 1M | Long-context multimodal work |
Kimi K3.1 Pro has published scores on 17 benchmarks we track, and leads 9 of them. All of them are the lab's own reports; each row links to the page that published it.
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Leader | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 Agents and computer use | 65.7% max effort | #1 of 33 | Kimi K3.1 Pro leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| Humanity's Last Exam Expert knowledge · With tools | 70% max effort, with tools | #1 of 19 | Kimi K3.1 Pro leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| CharXiv Reasoning Vision and documents · No tools | 89% max effort, no tools | #1 of 9 | Kimi K3.1 Pro leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| DeepSWE Coding | 75.5% max effort | #3 of 27 | Gemini 4 Argon · 77.9% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark Professional work | 23.7% max effort | #1 of 7 | Kimi K3.1 Pro leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| ProgramBench Coding | 31.5% max effort | #1 of 7 | Kimi K3.1 Pro leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| Agents' Last Exam Agents and computer use · CLI split | 44.2% max effort, CLI split | #1 of 6 | Kimi K3.1 Pro leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| APEX-Agents Professional work | 69.4% max effort | #1 of 6 | Kimi K3.1 Pro leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| BrowseComp Agents and computer use | 92.1% max effort | #1 of 6 | Kimi K3.1 Pro leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| Chartography Vision and documents · With tools | 90.2% max effort, with Python | #1 of 5 | Kimi K3.1 Pro leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| GDP.pdf Vision and documents · Default setting | 34.6% max effort, no tools | #2 of 7 | Gemini 3.8 Flash · 35% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| GPQA Diamond Expert knowledge | 94.2% max effort | #4 of 11 | GPT-6 Astra · 96% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| ExploitGym Cybersecurity | 20.7% max effort | #3 of 8 | GPT-6 Astra · 42.4% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| ExploitBench Cybersecurity | 74.7% max effort | #3 of 7 | GPT-6 Astra · 100% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| OSWorld 2 Agents and computer use · 2.1, partial score | 79.6% max effort | #4 of 6 | Claude Opus 5.5 · 81.8% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| Terminal-Bench-Science AI research | 38.1% max effort | #6 of 9 | GPT-6 Astra · 68.1% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| PostTrainBench AI research | 36.5% max effort, v1.2 | #5 of 6 | Gemini 4 Argon · 45.3% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
Kimi K3.1 Pro API pricing FAQ.
Kimi K3.1 Pro pricing questions - the card, what changed from Kimi K3, caching and the Highspeed variant.
Q · 01 What is Kimi K3.1 Pro priced at? +
$2.00/M cache-miss input, $0.20/M cache-hit input and $10.00/M output, with cache writes at $2.00/M for the 5-minute TTL and $4.00/M for 1 hour, for a 1,048,576-token context window. Under AI//COST's 92/8 agentic blend with 82% cache hits, the effective planning figure is $1.28/M. Prices exclude local taxes.Q · 02 What changed from Kimi K3? +
$3.00/M input and $15.00/M output and blends to $1.92/M; K3.1 Pro blends to $1.28/M, with every rate a third lower. Moonshot describes K3.1 Pro as a post-trained K3 with substantially larger post-training compute, and reasoning effort now offers low and high as well as max, where K3 accepted only max. K3 stays on the price list with no deprecation date.Q · 03 What does Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed cost? +
kimi-k3.1-pro-highspeed, which Moonshot says runs at 2-3x the speed of K3.1 Pro, lists at $4.00/M input, $0.20/M cache-hit input, $4.00/M and $8.00/M cache writes, and $20.00/M output - twice the standard rates except the cache read. This page prices the standard model.Q · 04 How does prompt caching work? +
$2.00/M - the same as fresh input, so a miss costs nothing extra - or with a 1-hour TTL at $4.00/M when you ask for it. Cache hits bill at $0.20/M, a 90% discount, and the calculator's default blend assumes 82% of input is served from cache.Q · 05 How does it compare with GPT-6.1 Sol? +
$2.00 / $10.00 sticker but reads cache at $0.10/M, so it blends to $1.29/M against $1.28/M here. GPT-6.1 Sol also moves to a dearer card above 272K input tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro has one rate across its 1M context.Q · 06 Are the weights open? +
Q · 07 What happens to the Kimi K2 models? +
Q · 08 How accurate is the tokenizer estimate? +
moonshot-tokenizer-estimate chars-per-token estimate for English text. Actual billing comes from Kimi API usage fields and can differ for Chinese, code, images, video, or mixed-language prompts.