Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite API Pricing
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite shipped GA on July 21, 2026 for high-volume agentic tasks, translation and simple data processing. It lists $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output, with cache hits at $0.03/M. Note the rate card before switching: per token it is dearer than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite. Pulled directly from ai.google.dev daily.
Run the numbers.
Live calculator pre-loaded with current Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite rates. Tweak spend, output mix, or cache assumptions and share the URL to share the calculation.
Real-world presets.
High-volume classification
Research planning turn
Codebase-scale migration
Reading 100-page contracts
Paste text. See tokens. See cost.
This is a chars-per-token approximation, not a real tokenizer. Actual tokens vary by language, code density, and tool-call overhead — counts are typically ±10–20% off for English prose, more for code or non-Latin scripts. For exact billing, use the vendor's official tokenizer.
| Model | Input /M | Output /M | Effective blended | Context | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Current | $0.30 cache $0.03 | $2.50 | $0.27 agentic 92/8 | 1M | High-volume agentic + translation |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | $0.25 cache $0.03 | $1.50 | $0.18 cheaper on text | 1M | Cheapest per-token Gemini for text |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | $0.30 cache $0.03 | $2.50 | $0.27 same rate | 1M | Prior-gen twin of this rate card |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | $1.50 cache $0.15 | $7.50 | $0.96 pricier | 1M | Step up for harder agentic work |
| GPT-5.4 nano | $0.20 cache $0.02 | $1.25 | $0.15 cheaper | 400K | OpenAI's budget tier |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | $0.14 cache $0.0028 | $0.28 | $0.05 cheaper | 1M | Budget reasoning and coding |
Frequently asked.
Practical pricing questions, separated from calculator assumptions and regional taxes.
Q · 01 What is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite priced at? +
$0.30/M input, $2.50/M output and $0.03/M cached input, plus $1.00 per 1M tokens per hour of explicit cache storage. The single input rate covers text, image, video and audio.Q · 02 Google calls it the most cost-efficient GA model. Is it the cheapest Gemini? +
$0.25/M input and $1.50/M output against $0.30 and $2.50 here — and Gemini 2.5 Flash carries an identical rate card. Any saving has to come from this model finishing a task in fewer tokens, which is a claim to test on your own workload, not a lower rate.Q · 03 When is it cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite? +
$0.50/M for audio input against $0.25/M for text, while this model bills every modality at $0.30/M. Audio-heavy pipelines can therefore land cheaper here; text-only bulk work will not.Q · 04 Does output pricing include thinking tokens? +
$2.50/M. Thinking is supported on this model and there is no separate reasoning rate.Q · 05 How is the effective price calculated? +
$0.0786/M and an effective cost of $0.27/M. Every shelf row above uses the same formula.Q · 06 What does Batch or Flex inference cost? +
Q · 07 What context window does it support? +
Q · 08 How accurate is the tokenizer estimate? +
gemini-tokenizer-estimate chars-per-token ratio for English text — Google publishes no downloadable tokenizer, so this is an estimate, not exact counting. Actual billing comes from the API's usage metadata and differs for code, non-Latin scripts and multimodal input.