Last verified

Grok vs Gemini — which actually wins in 2026?

This pair splits cleanly. Grok 4.7 leads the composite — Intelligence Index 46.5 vs 40.9 — and terminal work, 25.8% vs 19.7% on Terminal-Bench 4.0. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs a fraction of it, $0.75 / $3.75 against $2.00 / $6.00, takes audio and video, and doubles the context. Google has published a price rise for January 1, 2027.

§ 01 / VERDICT

Who wins, category by category.

Skip to decision tree →
Category Winner Margin
Composite intelligence · AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 AGrok Grok 4.7 46.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash 40.9 (Artificial Analysis, read 2026-09-23; Grok at xhigh, Gemini at high)
Agentic terminal work · Terminal-Bench 4.0 AGrok 25.8% vs 19.7% on AA's uniform harness, and 37.6% vs 19.1% on tbench.ai, where Grok runs through Grok Build and Gemini through mini-SWE-agent
Hard-exam reasoning · Humanity's Last Exam BGemini 47.8% vs 43.1% to Gemini (Artificial Analysis, 2026-09-23)
Real-time information · live sources AGrok Grok reads live X posts inline; Gemini grounds on Google Search, billed at $14 per 1,000 requests after 5,000 free a month
API context window · API maximum BGemini 1M tokens against Grok's 500K, and no doubling step — Grok charges double above a 200K prompt
Multimodal input · what you can send BGemini Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts audio and video as well as text and images; Grok 4.7 takes text and images only
API cost · list rates per 1M tokens BGemini $0.75 / $3.75 against $2.00 / $6.00 — Gemini is cheaper on both, and blends to $0.481 against $1.19
Published price risk · announced changes AGrok Google has published a doubling of Gemini 3.8 Flash's rates from January 1, 2027; SpaceXAI has announced no change to Grok 4.7's card
Batch discount · async work BGemini Gemini's Batch and Flex tiers are half standard ($0.375 / $1.88); Grok 4.7 publishes no batch discount
Free tier · what $0 buys BGemini Gemini's free app tier runs 3.6 Flash with varying access to 3.1 Pro, and the API has a free tier whose content Google uses to improve its products
Office integration · where it lives BGemini Gemini is native in Gmail, Docs, Vids and Search; Grok offers connectors, the Grok Build CLI and X
Entry subscription · cheapest paid tier BGemini Google AI Plus is $4.99/mo and AI Pro $19.99/mo; the cheapest standalone Grok tier is SuperGrok at $30/mo
Best overall · for most teams ·Depends See the decision tree below
CHOOSE A · GROK

If you need real-time and cheap output tokens.

  • Composite lead — Grok 4.7 tops Artificial Analysis' Intelligence Index v4.3.2, 46.5 against 40.9
  • Terminal work — 25.8% against 19.7% on AA's harness, 37.6% against 19.1% on tbench.ai
  • Real-time X — live posts read inline, which Google has no equivalent of
  • Media in-thread — Grok Imagine generates images and video inside the same chat
  • Open harness — Grok Build is Apache-2.0 and ships on every plan, Free included
CHOOSE B · GEMINI

If you need context, multimodality and Google-native work.

  • 1M context — double Grok 4.7's window, and with no doubling step above 200K
  • Audio and video in — Gemini 3.8 Flash ingests both natively; Grok 4.7 takes text and images
  • Cost — $0.75 / $3.75 against $2.00 / $6.00, and half that again on Batch
  • Where you already work — Gmail, Docs, Vids, Search and the Workspace stack
  • Cheap entry — Google AI Plus at $4.99/mo, AI Pro at $19.99/mo
§ 02 / PRICING

What it actually costs.

Cost calculator →
Aspect Grok Gemini
Free tierwhat $0 buys verified Sep 23 $0 · Grok Free Real-time web and X search, voice mode, connectors and Grok Build, inside limits SpaceXAI does not quantify $0 · Gemini Free Access to 3.6 Flash with varying access to 3.1 Pro, image generation, Deep Research, Gemini Live and Canvas, plus 15 GB of storage B wins
Entry subscriptioncheapest paid tier verified Sep 23 $30/mo · SuperGrok Higher limits across Chat, Imagine, Voice and Build; the pricing page still names Grok 4.6 as the model it unlocks $4.99/mo · Google AI Plus 2x free-tier usage, video generation, Daily Brief, 200 Google Flow credits and 400 GB of storage B wins
Mainstream subscriptionthe tier most people buy verified Sep 23 $100/mo · SuperGrok Plus Significantly higher usage, 1080p video, priority access at peak times $19.99/mo · Google AI Pro 4x free-tier usage, 1,000 Flow credits, and access to Gemini 3.1 Pro in the app B wins
Power tierfor all-day use verified Sep 23 $300/mo · SuperGrok Heavy Top individual Grok tier; its price is published on the Grok Bot page rather than the pricing page $99.99–199.99/mo · AI Ultra $99.99 for 5x AI Pro usage, $199.99 for 20x, plus first access to features like Deep Think B wins
API · inputper 1M tokens · from snapshot verified Sep 21 $2.00 $0.75 B wins
API · outputper 1M tokens · from snapshot verified Sep 21 $6.00 $3.75 B wins
Effective API costBlended workload $/1M · from snapshot verified Sep 21 $1.19 $0.481 B wins
API context windowMax input tokens · from snapshot verified Sep 21 500K 1M B wins
Real cost / 1M charsTokenizer-adjusted prose — the tokenizer tax est. verified Sep 21 $0.519 $0.195 B wins
Team / enterpriseper seat verified Sep 23 $30/seat · Grok Business Seat management, RBAC, SSO, no training on business content Bundled · Workspace / Enterprise Gemini rides Google Workspace plans and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform; gemini.google prints consumer tiers only, so we quote no seat price here
§ 03 / FEATURES

Feature-by-feature, side by side.

Download CSV →
Capability Grok Gemini
API context window 500K tokens 1M tokens
Max output tokens ~ Not published 65K tokens
Vision / image input ✓ Images, screenshots ✓ Images, PDFs, screenshots
Audio input ✗ ✓ Native
Video input ✗ ✓ Native
Image generation ✓ Grok Imagine ✓ In-app image gen
Video generation ✓ Grok Imagine ✓ Veo (paid tiers)
Voice mode ✓ Voice mode (free too) ✓ Gemini Live
Real-time X integration ✓ Native ✗ (Google Search only)
Search grounding ✓ Live web + X ✓ Native Google Search
Deep research runs ~ Not a named feature ✓ Deep Research (free tier too)
Code execution sandbox ✓ Grok Build ✓ Canvas / code exec
Coding agent ✓ Grok Build, Apache-2.0, on every plan ~ Gemini CLI and third-party harnesses
Custom assistants ✗ ~ Gems (no public store)
Connectors ✓ Connectors (free too) ✓ Workspace + Drive
Office / productivity integration ~ Connectors only ✓ Native Workspace
Function calling / tool use ✓ Native ✓ Native
Prompt caching ✓ $0.50/M read ✓ $0.075/M read, plus storage per hour
Batch API discount ✗ (not published for Grok 4.7) ✓ $0.375 / $1.88 per 1M
SOC 2 compliance ✓ Type I & II (all tiers) ✓ Workspace / Cloud
SSO / SCIM ✓ Business tier ✓ Workspace admin
Desktop apps ✗ (web only) ~ Web + Chrome
Mobile apps iOS + Android iOS + Android
EU availability ~ US API regions only; resold on Bedrock and Foundry ✓ Broad
§ 04 / BENCHMARKS

The numbers, not the spin.

General intelligence · AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2
Grok
46.5%
Gemini
40.9%
Artificial Analysis, read 2026-09-23 · 10-evaluation composite · Grok 4.7 at xhigh, Gemini 3.8 Flash at high · v4.3.2 rescaled the index, so July figures are not comparable
Agentic coding · Terminal-Bench 4.0
Grok
25.8%
Gemini
19.7%
Artificial Analysis' uniform harness, read 2026-09-23 · on tbench.ai it is 37.58% ±3.54 for Grok 4.7 via Grok Build against 19.09% ±3.36 for Gemini 3.8 Flash via mini-SWE-agent — the harness is part of the score
Hard reasoning · Humanity's Last Exam
Grok
43.1%
Gemini
47.8%
Artificial Analysis, read 2026-09-23 · Gemini's one clear win among the three cards here
§ 05 / DEEP DIVE

What each does best.

Brand hubs →
A · XAI

Grok

The real-time-first assistant — native to X, ahead on the composite index, and cheaper where output tokens dominate the bill.

Strengths

  • Composite lead — 46.5 against 40.9 on AA's Intelligence Index v4.3.2
  • Terminal work — ahead on both Terminal-Bench 4.0 boards, by 6 points on AA's harness and 18 on tbench.ai
  • Real-time X — live posts inline, billed per post fetched
  • Media — images and video generated in-thread by Grok Imagine
  • Open harness — Grok Build under Apache-2.0 on every plan

Weaknesses

  • Costs roughly 2.7x Gemini on input and 1.6x on output, before cache
  • No audio or video input; Grok 4.7 is text + image only
  • 500K context, and every rate doubles at a 200K-token prompt
  • No batch discount, where Gemini halves both rates

Best for

  • X-native creators, journalists and analysts
  • Real-time event coverage and breaking-news research
  • Output-heavy API workloads where generation dominates spend
  • Prompts other assistants deflect
B · GOOGLE

Gemini

The context-and-Google-native assistant — 1M tokens, audio and video input, Workspace integration, and the broader free tier of the two.

Strengths

  • 1M context — double Grok 4.7's window on the API model
  • Audio and video input — native, on the same rate card
  • Cheapest card in this pair — $0.75 / $3.75, halved again on Batch and Flex
  • Hard-exam reasoning — 47.8% on Humanity's Last Exam against Grok's 43.1%
  • Distribution — Gmail, Docs, Vids, Search and Workspace

Weaknesses

  • Behind on the composite index and on both Terminal-Bench boards
  • Google has published a doubling of these rates from January 1, 2027
  • Search grounding is billed separately: $14 per 1,000 requests after 5,000 free a month
  • The free API tier is explicitly used to improve Google's products

Best for

  • Long-document and long-context work
  • Teams already living in Google Workspace
  • Audio and video analysis pipelines
  • Prompt-heavy API workloads that lean on caching and batch
  • Anyone in the EU
§ 06 / SCENARIOS

Picked by scenario.

More scenarios →
01

Journalist covering breaking news on X

You file several stories a day during fast-moving events and need to verify quotes and pull live reactions from X within minutes.

Reasoning: Grok reads live X posts inline, so you skip the copy-paste from a separate tab. Gemini grounds on Google Search with citations, which is better for the wider web but has no X-native path. For X-driven stories, Grok cuts the most time out of the loop.

Picked
Grok
Runner-up: Gemini where the story is broader than X and cited sources matter more
02

Analyst summarising a 400-page filing

You drop long PDFs and transcripts into an assistant and ask it to trace claims across the whole document rather than a chunked subset.

Reasoning: Gemini 3.8 Flash carries a 1M-token window against Grok 4.7's 500K, so more of the document survives in a single pass — and the last 300K of Grok's window costs double, because every Grok rate doubles once a prompt reaches 200K tokens. Gemini also takes audio and video natively, which matters when the "document" is a recording. The counterweight is the dated one: Google has published a doubling of Gemini 3.8 Flash's rates from January 1, 2027, so a long-lived pipeline should price both years.

Picked
Gemini
Runner-up: Grok with manual chunking if you also need live X context
03

API developer on a generation-heavy workload

Your product streams long completions — drafts, summaries, agent turns — so output tokens, not prompts, dominate the monthly bill.

Reasoning: Gemini now undercuts Grok on every axis: $0.75 vs $2 input, $3.75 vs $6 output, $0.075 vs $0.30 cached. Google halved the Flash card on August 14, 2026, which reversed what used to be Grok's output-price advantage. The one caveat is duration — Gemini's rate is scheduled to double on January 1, 2027, while Grok's is flat. The verdict flips on prompt-heavy workloads. Check the blended and tokenizer-adjusted rows above against your own input/output mix.

Picked
Grok
Runner-up: Gemini 3.8 Flash once caching or batch enters the picture
04

Team that lives in Google Workspace

Your day is Gmail, Docs, Sheets and Meet, and you want an assistant that reads and writes across those without copy-paste.

Reasoning: Gemini is native inside Workspace and bundled at no extra AI charge, so the marginal cost of rolling it out to a team already paying for Workspace is zero. Grok offers connectors but no Office-class integration, and it publishes no seat price for its Business tier. For a Google-first team, this isn't close.

Picked
Gemini
Runner-up: Grok Business for X-native organisations, via sales
05

Developer or user based in the EU

You're building from, or working in, the EU and need the model available through a normal console and account today.

Reasoning: Region terms decide this one. SpaceXAI serves Grok from US regions only (us-east-1, us-west-2, us-central-1), with a US regional endpoint at a 10% premium and no EU processing commitment; EU users did get API-console access to Grok 4.5 in July 2026, which is availability rather than residency. Google runs Gemini broadly and sells enterprise terms through Workspace and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform. If EU data residency is contractual for you, that asymmetry is the whole decision.

Picked
Gemini
Runner-up: Grok via a non-EU entity, if your compliance team allows it
06

Researcher on a zero budget

You want serious assistant work — research runs, image generation, a canvas to iterate in — without paying anything.

Reasoning: Gemini's free app tier runs 3.6 Flash with varying access to 3.1 Pro, plus image generation, Deep Research, Gemini Live and Canvas, and 15 GB of storage. Grok's free tier gives real-time web and X search, voice mode, connectors and Grok Build, but SpaceXAI does not quantify the limits anywhere. One free tier is described in features, the other in adjectives — and on the API side Google's free tier is explicit that content is used to improve its products.

Picked
Gemini
Runner-up: Grok free for real-time X monitoring alongside it

Frequently asked.

Common questions about this comparison, with sources where they matter.

Q · 01 Is Grok or Gemini better overall? +
Neither wins outright — they trade categories. Grok leads on real-time X access, Artificial Analysis' composite index (54 vs 50), and pricing that carries no expiry date ($6/M output flat, against Gemini's promotional $7.50/M). Gemini leads on context (1M vs 500K), audio and video input, input price, Workspace integration, free-tier generosity, and EU availability. On GPQA Diamond they tie (93.1 vs 94.1, inside the error band). The best pick depends on your workload — see the decision tree above.
Q · 02 Which is cheaper? +
Gemini, on every line of the card. Input $0.75 against $2.00, output $3.75 against $6.00, cache reads $0.075 against $0.50, and Batch at half standard where Grok 4.7 has no batch discount at all. Blended on our standard agentic mix that is $0.481 against $1.19. One caveat with a date on it: Google has published that these rates double on January 1, 2027.
Q · 03 Which has the larger context window? +
Gemini, by double. Gemini 3.8 Flash carries a 1M-token window against Grok 4.7's 500K, and Google charges one rate across the whole window. Grok charges two: at or above a 200K-token prompt every rate doubles, for the entire request, so the upper half of Grok's smaller window is also its expensive half.
Q · 04 Which is better for coding? +
Grok, on the public data. Terminal-Bench 4.0 covers both: Artificial Analysis' uniform harness has Grok 4.7 at 25.8% and Gemini 3.8 Flash at 19.7%, and the benchmark's own board at tbench.ai — where Grok runs through Grok Build and Gemini through mini-SWE-agent — has 37.6% against 19.1%. Both boards agree on the direction, which is more than the July version of this page could say. Neither model has a neutral SWE-bench Verified entry.
Q · 05 Is Grok available in the EU? +
Partly. SpaceXAI serves the Grok API from US regions only and publishes no EU data-residency commitment; its one regional option is a US endpoint at a 10% premium. EU users did gain API-console access to Grok 4.5 in July 2026, and Grok 4.6 is resold on Amazon Bedrock and Microsoft Foundry, whose own EU regions are a question for those platforms. Gemini is broadly available, and Google sells EU terms through Workspace and its enterprise platform.
Q · 06 Does Grok read live X posts and Gemini doesn't? +
Yes, for X specifically. Grok pulls live posts from X inline without a separate browsing step — it's the one capability Gemini has no answer to. Gemini grounds answers on live Google Search with citations, which covers the wider web better but has no X-native path. For breaking news on X, Grok is materially faster.
Q · 07 Can I use both? +
Many people do — Gemini for long-context, Workspace and multimodal work, Grok for X-native research and real-time events. On the API, multi-model routers (LiteLLM, OpenRouter) let you switch per request, so you can send prompt-heavy calls to Gemini and generation-heavy calls to Grok. Note that Grok's API console isn't available in the EU yet.
Q · 08 What does a tied benchmark actually mean? +
When two models sit inside the error band — GPQA Diamond 93.1 vs 94.1 against a ±1.7 margin — the difference is noise, not signal. It also matters that the two scores come from different leaderboards. Treat those categories as a genuine tie and let cost, context, availability and integration decide instead of chasing a fraction of a point.
Q · 09 Which is better for privacy and enterprise controls? +
Both offer real controls, and they differ on defaults. SpaceXAI lists SOC 2 Type I and II across Grok tiers, with no training on business content, custom data retention and SSO on Business and Enterprise. Google's paid API tier states plainly that content is not used to improve its products, while the free API tier states that it is — and in the consumer Gemini app, activity settings decide it. Read the tier you are actually on, not the brand.