Last verified
CybersecurityVendor-reportedPrices verified

CyberGym leaderboard

As of November 8, 2026, MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi MiMo) leads CyberGym at 95.1%, ahead of MiMo-V2.6-Pro at 94% and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at 88.1%. 8 systems ranked. Every score here is published by the model's own lab; each row links to the page it comes from.

Top score
95.1%
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Systems ranked
8
one setting
Independent rows
0/8
all vendor-reported
Cheapest near top
$0.0477/1M
MiMo-V2.6-Flash · within 5 pts
With API prices
8/8
rates from our price index
Newest score
Oct 19
2026 · newest result

What is CyberGym? CyberGym tests whether an AI agent can reproduce real software vulnerabilities: given a description of a historical bug and the unpatched code, write an input that triggers it. Made by UC Berkeley (Zhun Wang, Dawn Song and co-authors), June 2025.

§ 01 / LEADERBOARD

Top models on CyberGym, November 2026

8 entries
# Model Score Price / 1M Context Source
1 MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi MiMo
95.1%
as reported
$0.14 / $0.28 1M Vendor-reported Xiaomi
2 MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi MiMo
94%
as reported
$0.435 / $0.87 1M Vendor-reported Xiaomi
3 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek
88.1%
pass@1
$0.3 / $1.2 1M Vendor-reported DeepSeek
4 GLM-5.3 Zhipu (Z.ai / GLM)
84.5%
as reported
$1.4 / $4.4 1M Vendor-reported Z.ai (Zhipu)
5 DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek
83.3%
pass@1
$1.32 / $3.96 1M Vendor-reported DeepSeek
6 MiniMax M3.1 Flash MiniMax
82.2%
as reported
$0.15 / $0.6 1M Vendor-reported MiniMax
7 GLM-5.2 Zhipu (Z.ai / GLM)
77.2%
as reported
$1.4 / $4.4 1M Vendor-reported Z.ai (Zhipu)
8 DeepSeek V4 Flash Deprecated DeepSeek
76.7%
pass@1
$0.44 / $1.32 1M Vendor-reported DeepSeek
§ 02 / SCORE VS PRICE

CyberGym: score against price

70% 80% 90% 100% $0.03 $0.1 $0.3 $1 Effective price per 1M tokens (log scale) Score MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 82.2% at $0.0842MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 94% at $0.144DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 88.1% at $0.15DeepSeek V4 Pro: 83.3% at $0.569GLM-5.3: 84.5% at $0.78GLM-5.2: 77.2% at $0.78 MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 95.1% at $0.0477 MiMo-V2.6-Flash
The dashed line joins the models that no cheaper model beats: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (95.1%, $0.0477 per 1M tokens). Anything below the line costs more for a lower score. Price is the effective rate per 1M tokens on current list prices: 92% input, 8% output, 82% of input served from cache.
§ 03 / PROVENANCE

Can you trust CyberGym scores?

No independent leaderboard publishes CyberGym results for these models yet, so every number on this page is the lab's own report of its own model. Labs choose the harness, the effort level and the subset they report, and they rarely publish failures. Read the setting under each score before comparing two rows.

§ 04 / HOW IT WORKS

How CyberGym works

The task

The agent gets a text description of a memory-safety vulnerability and the C or C++ codebase before the fix, and has to write a proof-of-concept input that triggers the bug.

The score

Success rate: the input must crash the vulnerable build under sanitizers and not crash the patched one.

Test set

1,507 instances from 188 software projects, as published by the authors.

Made by

UC Berkeley (Zhun Wang, Dawn Song and co-authors), first published June 2025.

Official sources

§ 05 / SOURCES

Sources and freshness

8 published scores from 4 sources. Each was read on its source page; the oldest reading on this page is from November 8, 2026. Prices beside each score come from our model price index and move when a vendor reprices.

CyberGym FAQ

Answers derived from the 8 published scores on this page and the current price index.

Q · 01

Which AI model has the highest CyberGym score?

+
MiMo-V2.6-Flash with 95.1% (as reported), as reported by Xiaomi on September 22, 2026. Next: MiMo-V2.6-Pro at 94% and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at 88.1%.
Q · 02

What is the cheapest model near the top of CyberGym?

+
The leader itself. No priced model within 5 points of MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper: it runs at $0.0477 per 1M tokens on our effective blend ($0.14 input, $0.28 output).
Q · 03

Are these CyberGym scores independently verified?

+
Not yet. Every score here is the model maker's own report. Each row names the lab and links to the page where it published the number.
Q · 04

What does CyberGym measure?

+
CyberGym tests whether an AI agent can reproduce real software vulnerabilities: given a description of a historical bug and the unpatched code, write an input that triggers it. The agent gets a text description of a memory-safety vulnerability and the C or C++ codebase before the fix, and has to write a proof-of-concept input that triggers the bug.
Q · 05

How is the CyberGym score calculated?

+
Success rate: the input must crash the vulnerable build under sanitizers and not crash the patched one. The test set has 1,507 instances from 188 software projects.
Q · 06

How current is this CyberGym leaderboard?

+
The newest score was published on October 19, 2026. Every row shows the date its source published it, and we last read all of them on November 8, 2026. Prices come from our model price index, where each rate carries the date it was read on the vendor's page.

One weekly digest. Zero noise.

One weekly digest · No spam, ever · Unsubscribe in one click