Grok Bot pricing: bundled, never sold

There is a trial, and it is not the kind you think. It is a usage credit rather than a stretch of days — the seven-day window is the outer bound, not the meter — and it is drawn down by agent steps and tokens rather than by messages. The vendor states outright that one large job can consume all of it in a single run, that this is expected, and that spent credit is never restored. So the trial rewards a small, tightly scoped first task and punishes the instinct to hand it something ambitious. When it runs out, this is the cheapest paid row on the page. One warning worth reading before you press it: ending the trial early deletes whatever credit is left and you cannot claim it again.

It does count — an individual SuperGrok, SuperGrok Plus or SuperGrok Heavy account can be linked and becomes the grant Grok Bot runs on. Three things are worth knowing first. You still sign in with a Cursor account, because the meter lives there and not on Grok. The link is permanent: the vendor says it cannot be undone or moved to a different Cursor account, so sign in as the right person before you press it. And SuperGrok Lite does not qualify, nor do SuperGrok Team and Enterprise accounts — only individual ones link.

It bought you nothing, and this is the most expensive thing on the page to get wrong. The vendor devotes a section of its own plan sheet to it: the two grants do not stack. Holding both does not add allowance — Grok Bot simply uses whichever is larger. The examples are the vendor's own: linking the mid Grok tier on top of Cursor Pro+ adds nothing, and buying the top Cursor tier while the top Grok tier is already linked adds nothing either. Both subscriptions keep billing normally; only the grants refuse to combine. What does raise the allowance is moving up within one ladder, and that is a plan change rather than a second grant.

This is the top of the individual ladder, and also the point at which the pricing stops being answerable. The vendor describes what you are buying as "highest weekly usage", the tier below as "generous weekly usage, below Ultra", and the one below that as "weekly usage, below Pro+". That is the entire published specification. There is no unit, no number and no rate, so the one question a reader at this level actually has — does ten times the price buy ten times the work — cannot be answered from anything the vendor publishes. Our advice is the uncomfortable one: climb the ladder a rung at a time and watch the meter in the app, because the meter is the only place the allowance becomes a quantity.

Straightforward by the standards of this page: every member on a self-serve team has it, no admin has to enable anything, no premium seat has to be assigned, and the allowance follows the seat each person is on. Two differences from individual plans that matter to whoever owns the budget. Overage is on by default here, where individuals have to switch it on themselves. And there is no separate Grok Bot spend cap — the vendor says so in as many words — so what you are actually capping is account-level on-demand spend across everything, with the Grok Bot share visible only after the fact on the usage dashboard.

This is the only route where the answers are configurable rather than fixed, and the controls that exist nowhere else are precisely the ones a review asks for: an organisation-wide switch, network policy, enforced auto-review, action recording. Go in with three facts already in hand. The cloud computers run in the United States today, and residency is a conversation rather than a setting. Every bot on an account shares one computer, so the documentation warns against treating separate bots as a security boundary. And the model allowlist, which is the control most reviews will fixate on, is described by the vendor as not guaranteed — onboarding asks you to acknowledge that Grok Bot may not follow it.